Another type of scientific studies are worried about sexting risks that happen even when the sexting is held completely personal: intimate texting is likened up to a “gateway drug” (Diliberto & Mattey, 2009) leading to many other kinds of dangerous or improper intimate behavior such as for example promiscuity, non-safe sex, or intimate infidelity. Sexting behavior is positioned in a context of adolescent impulsivity, bad judgment, feeling searching, and problematic liquor and medication usage. Sexting is observed being a manifestation or moderator of problematic and age inappropriate sexual behavior (Dir, Cyders, & Coskunpinar, 2013).

Yet another type of scientific studies are worried about the hyperlink between sexting and intimate objectification along with between sexting and intimate physical violence. The production and change of sexualized photos is undoubtedly the unhealthy objectification particularly of teenage girls which can be harmful by itself (Jewell & Brown, 2013; Maurović & Knežević, 2012) and that can place minors vulnerable to intimate molestation and punishment by peers or grownups (Fontenot & Fantasia, 2011; Hua, 2012).

Adolescent participation in risky and deviant sexting behavior is primarily explained by a) thoughtlessness, b) peer force, and c) high-risk character faculties. Danger avoidance is urgently required. Often it’s suggested that youth have to be better educated about the feasible negative effects of sexting (especially the different kinds of social and appropriate sanctions against adolescent sexters) to enable them to overcome thoughtlessness and pressure that is peer. Continue reading →